Player:WaterSlide: Difference between revisions

From MC Public Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


== Corruption Accusations ==
== Corruption Accusations ==
In September of 2011, WaterSlide was connected to forces of corruption in the Township of Brom by reporters of the Brom Tribune. Before they could forward their evidence to a team of special investigators, offices of the Tribune, including their records room, were destroyed in a mysterious fire, suspected to be arson. In October of that year, new evidence was forwarded to the Brom Lords, implying embezzlement occurring during the financing and construction of the Brom Land Terminal. The authorities of Brom Empire failed to investigate in a timely manner, and Brom Rails' offices were swiftly cleared of incriminating records. Ties to various criminal elements operating in the UnterBrom were never brought fully to light, and despite the bad press WaterSlide received during the police brutality scandal, culminating in accusations of racism against cactus people, no criminal charges were ever filed. Drastic shifts in the handling of the theme of corruption in Brom's newspapers were due to suspicious replacement of editors during this period of political crisis. The inflammatory nature of these accusations never followed through by the law led to the marginalization of several of these newspapers as 'yellow journalism'.
In September 2011, WaterSlide was connected to forces of corruption in the Township of Brom by reporters of the Brom Tribune. Before they could forward their evidence to a team of special investigators, offices of the Tribune, including their records room, were destroyed in a mysterious fire, suspected to be arson. In October of that year, new evidence was forwarded to the Brom Lords, implying embezzlement occurring during the financing and construction of the Brom Land Terminal. The authorities of Brom Empire failed to investigate in a timely manner, and Brom Rails' offices were swiftly cleared of incriminating records. Ties to various criminal elements operating in the UnterBrom were never brought fully to light, and despite the bad press WaterSlide received during the police brutality scandal, culminating in accusations of racism against cactus people, no criminal charges were ever filed. Drastic shifts in the handling of the theme of corruption in Brom's newspapers were due to suspicious replacement of editors during this period of political crisis. The inflammatory nature of these accusations never followed through by the law led to the marginalization of several of these newspapers as 'yellow journalism'.

Revision as of 01:27, 11 March 2012

WaterSlide
Authority PvE Admin
Favorite server PvE
Left please don't :(

Waterslide is the most awesome admin on the PvE server (tied with Wickedcoolsteve and schererererer of course).

Post nice stuff about him here!

Waterslide is a total bro. -Segasaturn95

Waterslide... He never covered an entire town in dirt. (you know who you are) -Nolan

:( -scherer

Corruption Accusations

In September 2011, WaterSlide was connected to forces of corruption in the Township of Brom by reporters of the Brom Tribune. Before they could forward their evidence to a team of special investigators, offices of the Tribune, including their records room, were destroyed in a mysterious fire, suspected to be arson. In October of that year, new evidence was forwarded to the Brom Lords, implying embezzlement occurring during the financing and construction of the Brom Land Terminal. The authorities of Brom Empire failed to investigate in a timely manner, and Brom Rails' offices were swiftly cleared of incriminating records. Ties to various criminal elements operating in the UnterBrom were never brought fully to light, and despite the bad press WaterSlide received during the police brutality scandal, culminating in accusations of racism against cactus people, no criminal charges were ever filed. Drastic shifts in the handling of the theme of corruption in Brom's newspapers were due to suspicious replacement of editors during this period of political crisis. The inflammatory nature of these accusations never followed through by the law led to the marginalization of several of these newspapers as 'yellow journalism'.