Talk:Quick-start guide (Creative): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yagi takeru (talk | contribs) |
Yagi takeru (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* I added a section about this based on an answer given in chat by marting11 [[User:Mike acosta|Mike acosta]] 18:15, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | * I added a section about this based on an answer given in chat by marting11 [[User:Mike acosta|Mike acosta]] 18:15, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | ||
**i think i may have figured out the way to get the best of both worlds :D. gimme a second[[User:Yagi takeru|Yagi takeru]] 19:12, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | **i think i may have figured out the way to get the best of both worlds :D. gimme a second[[User:Yagi takeru|Yagi takeru]] 19:12, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | ||
* ok made "not asking" a quote and commented a disclaimer into the html file. also added the usual follow up question "Really?" and the answer from above to that with minor editing. [[User:Yagi takeru|Yagi takeru]] 19:22, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
** Thank you. I've slightly re-worded it, and removed the attribution to marting11, since it wasn't really an official policy, just a response to another user I spotted in chat. Left the comment in, though. I don't want to bug an admin about it, but maybe an "official" FAQ entry for this could be better worded by one of them. [[User:Mike acosta|Mike acosta]] 19:50, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
***ill try and talk to a few admins about it if i can. I'm going to avoid pestering though so i cant say ill actually get an answer.[[User:Yagi takeru|Yagi takeru]] 20:46, 30 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:46, 1 October 2011
Just finished a huge edit to the FAQ section
i was thinking though should we add the so common "can i be a moderator/admin?" question and tag it with a definitive answer?
- Good idea. I'm not sure what the definitive answer is, other than "No." Any idea on wording? The best I can think of is "Moderators are chosen from a small, trusted group of long-time contributors." I don't know how the nomination process works for certain, though. Mike acosta 16:08, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- I added a section about this based on an answer given in chat by marting11 Mike acosta 18:15, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- i think i may have figured out the way to get the best of both worlds :D. gimme a secondYagi takeru 19:12, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- ok made "not asking" a quote and commented a disclaimer into the html file. also added the usual follow up question "Really?" and the answer from above to that with minor editing. Yagi takeru 19:22, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- Thank you. I've slightly re-worded it, and removed the attribution to marting11, since it wasn't really an official policy, just a response to another user I spotted in chat. Left the comment in, though. I don't want to bug an admin about it, but maybe an "official" FAQ entry for this could be better worded by one of them. Mike acosta 19:50, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- ill try and talk to a few admins about it if i can. I'm going to avoid pestering though so i cant say ill actually get an answer.Yagi takeru 20:46, 30 September 2011 (CDT)
- Thank you. I've slightly re-worded it, and removed the attribution to marting11, since it wasn't really an official policy, just a response to another user I spotted in chat. Left the comment in, though. I don't want to bug an admin about it, but maybe an "official" FAQ entry for this could be better worded by one of them. Mike acosta 19:50, 30 September 2011 (CDT)