Template talk:PvE Atlas r6: Difference between revisions

From MC Public Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Out of date: new section)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 320: Line 320:


I think the area that constitutes the centre of the map should be increased, say to 500 from spawn. A few of the villages that are relativley lose, few minutes walk from spawn are technically not considered central locations. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] 01:56, 7 February 2012 (CST)
I think the area that constitutes the centre of the map should be increased, say to 500 from spawn. A few of the villages that are relativley lose, few minutes walk from spawn are technically not considered central locations. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] 01:56, 7 February 2012 (CST)
Actually, weather a 9-cell or 4-column is to be used, I think the area that is considered central should be around 500 to 1000, probably kept to a multiple of 250 [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] 12:55, 7 February 2012 (CST)


== Far east ==
== Far east ==
Line 328: Line 330:


:I think center column could be 500 blocks to east and west. Or even 1000. I have to put one template level more there so then those cells will be even. [[User:Purine|Purine]] 06:22, 7 February 2012 (CST)
:I think center column could be 500 blocks to east and west. Or even 1000. I have to put one template level more there so then those cells will be even. [[User:Purine|Purine]] 06:22, 7 February 2012 (CST)
== Another possible version ==


{{PvE Atlas r6/huge}}
{{PvE Atlas r6/huge}}


Okay.... Maybe I do 6x6 cell table since the map is 6000x6000. :D [[User:Purine|Purine]] 08:30, 7 February 2012 (CST)
Okay.... Maybe I do 6x6 cell table since the map is 6000x6000. :D [[User:Purine|Purine]] 08:30, 7 February 2012 (CST)
personally, I don't like the look of this layout. I think having a three by three is probably the best solution. The only thing I would say needs to be discussed is how far from spawn is still considered 'central', I think some where between 500 and 1000 would be good, probably to the nearest 250. [[User:Thecoshman|Thecoshman]] 12:47, 7 February 2012 (CST)
== Out of date ==
This looks great thanks for all the awesome work put into this ! But ... It's now out of date and another one needs to be created. Keep up the great work! --[[User:Admin|DARKSKYNET]] 16:29, 25 February 2012 (CST)

Latest revision as of 22:29, 25 February 2012

I think these categories are unclear what should be where. I think it would be easier to group them northeast (+,+), southeast (+,-), southwest (-,-) and northwest (-,+). Purine 03:21, 26 January 2012 (CST)

Good point... I had just been going off whichever coordinate had the greater absolute value. Here's what the categories would look like grouped that way:
Northwest (-x, -z) Northeast (+x, -z) Southwest (-x, +z) Southeast (+x, +z)
One downside though, settlements right near the compass points sort of get lumped into a category that doesn't really describe their location... same problem that already exists with the current grouping. For comparison's sake, I tried grouping them in 9 sectors:
Northwest (-x, -z) North (-z) Northeast (+x, -z)
West (-x) Central (<300 blocks from spawn) East (+x)
Southwest (-x, +z) South (+z) Southeast (+x, +z)
Does a decent job grouping settlements into regions, but the end result is a rather cluttered layout. --Bencvt 09:34, 26 January 2012 (CST)

Testing

Central (<300 blocks from spawn) Northwest (-x, -z) Northeast (+x, -z) Southwest (-x, +z) Southeast (+x, +z)
Central (<300 blocks from spawn)
Spawn 0, 0
Seneca 0, -300
Snapperolle -246, -13
La Grès Cathedral -250, 250
Draco -160, 280
Shitburg 331, 41
EverBright 118, 268
Rocket Dominion ?, ?
Seattle ?, ?
Northwest (-x, -z) Northeast (+x, -z) Southwest (-x, +z) Southeast (+x, +z)

Purine 10:25, 26 January 2012 (CST)

9 cell template

v · d · e
PvE atlas
maps
   
v · d · e
Northwest
   
v · d · e
West
   
v · d · e
Southwest
   
v · d · e
North
   
v · d · e
Center
   
v · d · e
South
   
v · d · e
Northeast (+x, -z)
   
v · d · e
East
   
v · d · e
Southeast
   
other servers

Purine 08:28, 6 February 2012 (CST)

I very much like this layout. At first it looks a bit dodgy, then you see how well it shows where things are in the world Thecoshman 01:53, 7 February 2012 (CST)

Make 'centre' a larger area

If the 9-cell layout was to be used, this becomes a moot point.

I think the area that constitutes the centre of the map should be increased, say to 500 from spawn. A few of the villages that are relativley lose, few minutes walk from spawn are technically not considered central locations. Thecoshman 01:56, 7 February 2012 (CST)

Actually, weather a 9-cell or 4-column is to be used, I think the area that is considered central should be around 500 to 1000, probably kept to a multiple of 250 Thecoshman 12:55, 7 February 2012 (CST)

Far east

This again is a moot point if a 9-cell layout is used

The 'Eastern' settlements list is rather long, perhaps a far east column could be added. If this was set at those more 1500 from spawn in the x, currently seven settlements.

I think center column could be 500 blocks to east and west. Or even 1000. I have to put one template level more there so then those cells will be even. Purine 06:22, 7 February 2012 (CST)


Another possible version

Okay.... Maybe I do 6x6 cell table since the map is 6000x6000. :D Purine 08:30, 7 February 2012 (CST)

personally, I don't like the look of this layout. I think having a three by three is probably the best solution. The only thing I would say needs to be discussed is how far from spawn is still considered 'central', I think some where between 500 and 1000 would be good, probably to the nearest 250. Thecoshman 12:47, 7 February 2012 (CST)

Out of date

This looks great thanks for all the awesome work put into this ! But ... It's now out of date and another one needs to be created. Keep up the great work! --DARKSKYNET 16:29, 25 February 2012 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.nerd.nu/index.php?title=Template_talk:PvE_Atlas_r6&oldid=11765"